The Supper Still Divides

Luther’s bread theology cannot be reduced to metaphor.

At Marburg in 1529, Luther and Zwingli famously failed to agree on the Supper. Luther held to Christ’s real presence. Zwingli stressed memorial and sign. Calvin later offered a different Reformed account of real spiritual participation.1

The differences can be sketched simply.

TraditionBread In The Supper
LutheranChrist is truly present with the bread and wine.2
ReformedThe Supper is a sign with real spiritual participation.3
ZwinglianThe meal chiefly remembers and proclaims Christ.4
AnglicanThe formularies hold a broad Reformation range.5
Evangelical memorialBread and cup chiefly prompt obedient remembrance and proclamation.6
CatholicBread’s substance changes while species remain.7

This table is only a map. It does not replace the debates.

It also keeps “Protestant” from becoming a single view. Lutheran, Reformed, Anglican, Baptist, Restorationist, and free-church communities often share the words bread, cup, remembrance, and table while giving those words different doctrinal weight.

It does protect one point. Luther is not a memorialist. For him, the eucharistic bread remains the place where Christ gives himself.

That keeps this chapter tied to Transubstantiation And The Preservation Of The Accidents. Reformation disagreement changes the doctrinal account, but not the cultural weight of bread.

Related sections: Household Catechism; Bread After Reform.

Footnotes

  1. Marburg Articles, Article XV, 1529, in which the parties agree on much but record disagreement over whether Christ’s true body and blood are bodily present in the bread and wine. Primary source.

  2. Augsburg Confession, Article X, 1530, in Kolb and Wengert, Book of Concord, 44. Primary source.

  3. John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion IV.17.10-12. Primary source.

  4. Huldrych Zwingli, On the Lord’s Supper, 1526. Primary source.

  5. Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion, Article XXVIII, 1571. Primary source.

  6. For contemporary Protestant range, compare the Church of England’s description of Eucharistic forms and understandings at https://www.churchofengland.org/our-faith/what-we-believe/eucharist with the Christian Reformed Church’s account of the Supper as remembrance, nourishment, and participation at https://www.crcna.org/resources/church-resources/liturgical-forms/lords-supper/lords-supper-1994. Contemporary denominational sources.

  7. Council of Trent, Session 13, Decree on the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist, 1551. Primary source.

0 items under this folder.